Estudio multicéntrico de ingesta de imanes en los servicios de urgencias pediátricos españoles / Multicentre study of magnet ingestion in Spanish paediatric emergency departments

Introducción: Las ingestas de objetos imantados pueden presentar complicaciones en el niño, no existiendo datos epidemiológicos ni clínicos en España. Objetivos: Conocer la incidencia de ingesta de objetos imantados en los servicios de urgencias pediátricos españoles, sus características epidemiológicas y su manejo. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional prospectivo multicéntrico realizado durante 3 años. Población de referencia menores de 14 años. Resultados: La incidencia fue de 4,8/100.000 urgencias. De los 72 pacientes incluidos (edad media de 7,2 años), el 54% fueron varones. El 7% presentaron antecedentes neuropsiquiátricos. El 61% de los imanes fueron esféricos y el 69% procedían de juguetes. El tamaño fue variable con un predominio de los imanes entre 5 y 10mm (50%). El 86% fueron asintomáticos. El síntoma más frecuente fue el dolor abdominal. El 83% de los pacientes consultaron en menos de 6h y el 92% en las primeras 24h. El 31% fueron ingestas múltiples. El 15% precisó intervención endoscópica, cifra que ascendió al 36% en los casos de ingestas múltiples. No se realizó ninguna intervención quirúrgica. No se observó ninguna complicación gastrointestinal secundaria. Conclusiones: Las ingestas de imanes múltiples son menos frecuentes que las simples y en este estudio no se han observado complicaciones a pesar de que las intervenciones realizadas han sido menores que en otros estudios. (AU)

Introduction: The ingestion of magnetic objects can cause complications in children, and there are no epidemiological or clinical data on the subject in Spain. Objectives: To determine the incidence, epidemiological characteristics and management of magnet ingestion in paediatric emergency departments in Spain. Material and methods: Prospective observational multicentre study conducted over a 3-year period. The study universe consisted of patients aged less than 14 years. Results: The incidence was 4.8 cases per 100 000 emergency care episodes. Of the 72 patients included (mean age, 7.2 years), 54% were male. Seven percent had neuropsychiatric disorders. Sixty-one percent of the magnets were spherical and 69% came from toys. The size was variable, most frequently between 5 and 10mm (50%), and ranging from 3 to 30mm. Eighty-six percent of patients were asymptomatic. The most frequent symptom was abdominal pain. Eighty-three percent of the patients sought medical care within 6h of ingestion and 92% within 24h. Thirty-one percent of the cases were of multiple ingestion. Endoscopy was required for extraction in 15% of cases, a proportion that rose to 36% in the group of cases of multiple ingestion. None of the patients required surgery. We did not observe any gastrointestinal complications of magnet ingestion. Conclusions: The ingestion of multiple magnets is less frequent than single magnet ingestion, and we did not observe any complications despite the lower frequency of procedures compared to other studies. (AU)

Multicentre study of magnet ingestion in Spanish paediatric emergency departments.

INTRODUCTION: The ingestion of magnetic objects can cause complications in children, and there are no epidemiological or clinical data on the subject in Spain. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence, epidemiological characteristics and management of magnet ingestion in paediatric emergency departments in Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational multicentre study conducted over a 3-year period. The study universe consisted of patients aged less than 14 years. RESULTS: The incidence was 4.8 cases per 100 000 emergency care episodes. Of the 72 patients included (mean age, 7.2 years), 54% were male. Seven percent had neuropsychiatric disorders. Sixty-one percent of the magnets were spherical and 69% came from toys. The size was variable, most frequently between 5 and 10 mm (50%), and ranging from 3 to 30 mm. Eighty-six percent of patients were asymptomatic. The most frequent symptom was abdominal pain. Eighty-three percent of the patients sought medical care within 6 h of ingestion and 92% within 24 h. Thirty-one percent of the cases were of multiple ingestion. Endoscopy was required for extraction in 15% of cases, a proportion that rose to 36% in the group of cases of multiple ingestion. None of the patients required surgery. We did not observe any gastrointestinal complications of magnet ingestion. CONCLUSIONS: The ingestion of multiple magnets is less frequent than single magnet ingestion, and we did not observe any complications despite the lower frequency of procedures compared to other studies.

Documento de recomendaciones sobre la rehidratación intravenosa rápida en gastroenteritis aguda / Recommendation document on rapid intravenous rehydration in acute gastroenteritis

Introducción: Existe consenso en cuanto a la eficacia y seguridad de las pautas de rehidratación intravenosa rápida (RIR) en niños con deshidratación secundaria a gastroenteritis aguda (GEA), pero también una gran variabilidad en su uso en la práctica clínica. Objetivo: Elaborar un documento de recomendaciones sobre la RIR en población pediátrica basadas en la evidencia científica. Metodología: Se diseñó un proyecto basado en metodología GRADE, siguiendo el siguiente esquema de trabajo: formación del grupo de trabajo; formulación de preguntas de investigación y definición de «desenlaces de interés»; puntuación y selección de ítems; revisión bibliográfica; evaluación y síntesis de la evidencia (GRADE); revisión, discusión y formulación de recomendaciones. Se incluyeron 10 preguntas clínicas y 15 desenlaces de interés (siete de eficacia y ocho de seguridad). Resultados: Se establecieron 16 recomendaciones, destacando como principales: 1) la RIR es segura en niños con deshidratación leve-moderada secundaria a GEA, salvo contraindicación expresa o comorbilidad aguda grave (recomendación fuerte, evidencia moderada); 2) se recomienda su uso en este contexto cuando la rehidratación oral haya fracasado o esté contraindicada (fuerte, alta); 3) se recomienda utilizar sueros isotónicos (fuerte, alta), sugiriendo como primera opción el suero fisiológico (débil, baja), añadiendo glucosa (2,5%) en pacientes con glucemia normal y cetosis (fuerte, moderada); 4) se recomienda un ritmo de infusión de 20 mL/kg/hora (fuerte, alta), durante una a cuatro horas (fuerte, moderada). Conclusiones: En este documento se establecen recomendaciones de consenso, basadas en la evidencia científica disponible, que podrían contribuir a homogeneizar el uso de la RIR en nuestro medio. (AU)

Introduction: The efficacy and safety of the rapid intravenous rehydration (RIR) guidelines in children affected by dehydration secondary to acute gastroenteritis is supported by current scientific evidence, but there is also great variability in its use in clinical practice. Objective: To prepare a document with evidence-based recommendations about RIR in paediatric population. Methods: The project was developed based on GRADE methodology, according to the following work schedule: Working Group training; creation of a catalogue of questions about research and definition of «relevant outcomes»; score and selection criteria for each item; bibliographic review; scientific evidence evaluation and synthesis (GRADE); review, discussion and creation of recommendations. 10 clinical questions and 15 relevant outcomes were created (7 about efficacy and 8 about security). Results: Sixteen recommendations were set up, from which we can highlight as the main ones: (1) RIR is safe for children affected by mild-moderate dehydration secondary to acute gastroenteritis, unless expressly contraindicated or acute severe comorbidity (strong recommendation and moderate evidence). (2) Its use is recommended in this situation when oral rehydration has failed or due to contraindication (strong and high). (3) Isotonic fluids are recommended (strong and high), suggesting saline fluid as the first option (light and low), supplemented by glucose (2.5%) in those patients showing normoglycemia and ketosis (strong and moderate). (4) A rhythm of 20 cc/kg/h is recommended (strong and high) during 1–4 h (strong and moderate). Conclusions: This document establishes consensus recommendations, based on the available scientific evidence, which could contribute to the standardisation of the use of RIR in our setting. (AU)

Recommendation document on rapid intravenous rehydration in acute gastroenteritis.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy and safety of the Rapid Intravenous Rehydration (RIR) guidelines in children affected by dehydration secondary to acute gastroenteritis is supported by current scientific evidence, but there is also great variability in its use in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To prepare a document with evidence-based recommendations about RIR in paediatric population. METHODS: The project was developed based on GRADE methodology, according to the following work schedule: Working Group training; creation of a catalogue of questions about research and definition of "relevant outcomes"; score and selection criteria for each item; bibliographic review; scientific evidence evaluation and synthesis (GRADE); review, discussion and creation of recommendations. 10 clinical questions and 15 relevant outcomes were created (7 about efficacy and 8 about security). RESULTS: 16 recommendations were set up, from which we can highlight as the main ones: 1) RIR is safe for children affected by mild-moderate dehydration secondary to acute gastroenteritis, unless expressly contraindicated or acute severe comorbidity (strong recommendation, moderate evidence). 2) Its use is recommended in this situation when oral rehydration has failed or due to contraindication (strong, high). 3) Isotonic fluids are recommended (strong, high), suggesting saline fluid as the first option (light, low), supplemented by glucose (2.5%) in those patients showing normoglycemia and ketosis (strong, moderate). 4) A rhythm of 20cc/kg/h is recommended (strong, high) during 1-4 h (strong, moderate). CONCLUSIONS: This document establishes consensus recommendations, based on the available scientific evidence, which could contribute to the standardisation of the use of RIR in our setting.

[Recommendation document on rapid intravenous rehydration in acute gastroenteritis]. / Documento de recomendaciones sobre la rehidratación intravenosa rápida en gastroenteritis aguda.

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy and safety of the rapid intravenous rehydration (RIR) guidelines in children affected by dehydration secondary to acute gastroenteritis is supported by current scientific evidence, but there is also great variability in its use in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To prepare a document with evidence-based recommendations about RIR in paediatric population. METHODS: The project was developed based on GRADE methodology, according to the following work schedule: Working Group training; creation of a catalogue of questions about research and definition of «relevant outcomes¼; score and selection criteria for each item; bibliographic review; scientific evidence evaluation and synthesis (GRADE); review, discussion and creation of recommendations. 10 clinical questions and 15 relevant outcomes were created (7 about efficacy and 8 about security). RESULTS: Sixteen recommendations were set up, from which we can highlight as the main ones: (1) RIR is safe for children affected by mild-moderate dehydration secondary to acute gastroenteritis, unless expressly contraindicated or acute severe comorbidity (strong recommendation and moderate evidence). (2) Its use is recommended in this situation when oral rehydration has failed or due to contraindication (strong and high). (3) Isotonic fluids are recommended (strong and high), suggesting saline fluid as the first option (light and low), supplemented by glucose (2.5%) in those patients showing normoglycemia and ketosis (strong and moderate). (4) A rhythm of 20 cc/kg/h is recommended (strong and high) during 1-4 h (strong and moderate). CONCLUSIONS: This document establishes consensus recommendations, based on the available scientific evidence, which could contribute to the standardisation of the use of RIR in our setting.

Doble resultado falso en el cribado de drogas en una intoxicación accidental / Double false result in a drug screen after accidental pediatric poisoning

No disponible

Caídas en menores de un año: ¿qué hacemos en urgencias? / Falls in less than one year-old infants: Management in the emergency department

Objetivos: Describir y analizar las lesiones asociadas a caídas en los menores de un año, la actuación durante su atención en urgencias, los medios empleados en su manejo y los factores que condicionan un mayor uso de los mismos. Material y métodos: Estudio multicéntrico, descriptivo y analítico. Se incluyeron los menores de un año que habían acudido por caídas al servicio de urgencias de 8 hospitales integrantes del Grupo de Trabajo de Lesiones no Intencionadas de la Sociedad Española de Urgencias Pediátricas. Se recogieron datos sobre las circunstancias previas a la llegada a urgencias, las lesiones observadas, la actuación en urgencias y los medios empleados durante su manejo. Resultados: Se identificaron 1.022 pacientes, un 0,35% de las urgencias atendidas (IC 95%: 0,348-0,352). La localización más frecuente del traumatismo fue craneal (58%). La indicación de radiografía de cráneo (31,8%) se relacionó con hematomas o signos de fractura en la exploración física (p < 0,001), alturas mayores de 100cm (p < 0,001) y edad menor de 3 meses (p = 0,004). Tras el traumatismo craneal leve (85,6%), las fracturas fueron el diagnóstico más frecuente, fundamentalmente craneales (7,1%), asociándose con una edad menor de 3 meses (p < 0,001) y con la existencia de hematoma o signos de fractura en la exploración física (p < 0,001). Un 6% de los casos requirieron hospitalización, identificándose la edad menor a 3 meses y una caída mayor a 50 cm como factores de riesgo. Conclusiones: Las lesiones por caídas en los menores de un año se producen fundamentalmente por traumatismos craneales y siguen constituyendo una indicación frecuente de realización de pruebas complementarias (AU)

Objectives: A study was performed in order to describe injuries associated with falls in children aged <1 year who attended the emergency department. The approaches used were examined, as well as the factors associated with the greater use of these approaches, and the management of the patient. Patients and methods: This was a multicentre, descriptive and analytical study that included all patients aged <1 year who had experienced a fall for which they attended the emergency departments of one of 8 Spanish Hospitals belonging to the "Unintentional Paediatric Injury Working Group" of the Spanish Paediatric Society. A record was made of the data regarding the visit, circumstances before arrival at the hospital, injuries observed, and the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches used. Results: A total of 1022 patients had experienced falls, that is, 0.35% of the emergencies attended in the study hospitals (95% CI, 0,348-0,352). The most commonly affected part was the head (58%). Cranial radiography was ordered in 31.8% of cases, and was associated with the presence of bruising or signs of fracture on examination (P < .001), falls from heights > 100cm (P < .001), and age < 3 months (P = .004). Minor head injury was the most common finding (85.6%), followed by fractures, especially cranial fractures (7.1%), which were associated with bruising or signs of fracture on examination (P < .001), and age < 3 months (P < .001). Six percent of the patients required admission to hospital. The risk factors for hospital admission in this group were falls from heights >50 cm and age < 3 months. Conclusions: Injuries after falls in infants aged < 1 year are commonly due to head trauma and frequently require additional diagnostic tests (AU)

[Falls in less than one year-old infants: Management in the emergency department]. / Caídas en menores de un año: ¿qué hacemos en urgencias?

OBJECTIVES: A study was performed in order to describe injuries associated with falls in children aged <1 year who attended the emergency department. The approaches used were examined, as well as the factors associated with the greater use of these approaches, and the management of the patient. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicentre, descriptive and analytical study that included all patients aged <1 year who had experienced a fall for which they attended the emergency departments of one of 8 Spanish Hospitals belonging to the "Unintentional Paediatric Injury Working Group" of the Spanish Paediatric Society. A record was made of the data regarding the visit, circumstances before arrival at the hospital, injuries observed, and the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches used. RESULTS: A total of 1022 patients had experienced falls, that is, 0.35% of the emergencies attended in the study hospitals (95% CI, 0,348-0,352). The most commonly affected part was the head (58%). Cranial radiography was ordered in 31.8% of cases, and was associated with the presence of bruising or signs of fracture on examination (P<.001), falls from heights >100cm (P<.001), and age <3 months (P=.004). Minor head injury was the most common finding (85.6%), followed by fractures, especially cranial fractures (7.1%), which were associated with bruising or signs of fracture on examination (P<.001), and age <3 months (P<.001). Six percent of the patients required admission to hospital. The risk factors for hospital admission in this group were falls from heights >50cm and age <3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Injuries after falls in infants aged <1 year are commonly due to head trauma and frequently require additional diagnostic tests.